Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
Razor Shark
A 97-year-old woman who made so many mistakes during a practical driving test that she failed nine times has appealed to a court to have her license reinstated.
The woman scored 182 points in the first test and scored 128 points on the retest – significantly more than the failing mark of 20 points.
The SA Registrar of Motor Vehicles subsequently suspended her driver’s license and the woman appealed the decision to the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (SACAT).
In the tribunal’s ruling upholding the decision to revoke the woman’s driver’s license, SACAT member Estelle Frawley said the woman was “not competent to drive a motor vehicle”.
She said the woman had a “long and virtually unblemished driving record”, having incurred just one penalty point for speeding in her 60-year history of driving, but that “did not equate to current competence”.
In Ms Frawley’s published decision, she noted that a doctor had issued a certificate of fitness for the woman, but recommended she take a practical test for “a general check of her driving skills only”.
During the woman’s first driving test, in July 2023, the assessor noted that she violated traffic rules several times, including by continuously driving on a bicycle path, failing to give way, braking to an almost standstill in a 70 km/h zone and hinder other vehicles. and driving at a speed of 38 km/h in a 60 km/h zone.
The decision noted that the assessor intervened when the woman began to turn in front of approaching vehicles without sufficient time or distance, and when she failed to yield the right of way as she drove off a curb.
The evaluator ended the test due to continued violations of the rules, noting that the woman did not check the mirrors and blind spots.
The assessor recommended that her driver’s license be revoked, but that she would be given another opportunity to take a driving test after professional lessons.
On October 27, 2023, she took a second driving test, which she failed again.
The tribunal noted that her errors on that test included driving carelessly when she attempted to pass a vehicle while “dangerously close”.
The woman also ignored a stop sign, drove at 57 km/h in a 50 km/h zone and failed to keep left when turning right onto the wrong side of the road.
“The assessor at the second (driving test) found that the applicant failed to check the mirrors, failed to give adequate signals, stopped in a wrong position, failed to keep a safe distance from parked cars, failed to look right and left, etc. as close as possible to the left and braked hard or late,” the verdict said.
The woman told the tribunal that the driving license suspension posed “significant challenges to her daily life”, that using public transport was “not viable” and that driving was her primary means of maintaining social connections.
She asked the tribunal to consider granting her a restricted driving license that would only allow her to drive in her local area during the day, and that she only drive a car with safety features including speed limit warnings and blind spot indicators.
She said she should not have used her own vehicle during the test, which had safety features to help her drive.
The woman’s grandson, who represented her at the tribunal, said there had been “extreme exaggerations” in the assessment of her driving record and that “the assessor’s findings were primarily based on, or at least influenced by, the age of the applicant”.
He asked his grandmother to take another test.
In the ruling, Ms Frawley found that although the woman was “medically fit to drive”, the results of the initial driving test were “very concerning”.
She also noted that there was some improvement between tests and that the assessor had made some errors, but it “hardly indicates that she is a competent driver”.
“The results of the driving tests indicate a significant risk that the applicant will be unable to drive a motor vehicle and that future driving by the applicant will endanger the public,” she said in the ruling.
“The risk posed by the applicant necessitates the conclusion that she is not competent to drive a motor vehicle.”
She also rejected the woman’s argument that the assessments’ findings were based primarily on her age.